Friday, January 30, 2009

Obama Drama

Not everyone loves Obama. Today brought the drama- at least for me. During the discussion in a pretty innocuous class on the lack of participation by "North America" during events following the US Social Forum (heard of that one? yeah, me neither), someone in the class asked the United Stater presenter what he felt about Obama. The presenter declined to comment, showing his uncomfortability and desire to stay true to topic. The class was not detoured- more general comments about Obama led to a small debate about the purpose of the WSF. Enter France into the discussion. Marie, a French woman (who also happens to be our hotel neighbor) expressed frustration, proclaiming that she didn't understand why the group wanted to talk about Obama- "he's a centrist, a conservative- the World Social Forum is about radicals."

I was in a difficult emotional place. I generally don't respond to the anti-U.S., anti-imperialist nature of banners and rhetoric because I see the historical truth to this analysis- especially in light of the U.S.'s atrocious interventionist policy in Latin American politics. And, I generally agree with the lady from France that Obama is a moderate- he is most definitely to the right of many of my colleagues politically. However, my soul was calling for rebuttal. So, I stated that even if Obama was a political centrist, the election of Obama was radical because it was an election of a person from a historically excluded group- and that is what I thought the WSF was about. Although she acknowledged that we were here to discuss inclusion of excluded groups, she said that she was friends with the Black Panthers and that the U.S. voters should have picked the radical.... wait for it.... John Edwards!

I didn't comment again, but in my mind I saw myself asking her if the Africans in France thought that the election of Obama was radical or whether France is anywhere near electing a candidate of African descent. Such a question could have provoked a lively discussion, but it is divisive, no? Instead I told the entire class that they could come talk to me after the discussion if they wanted to talk about my feelings on Obama. One took me up on it, and it was not Marie.

A young Brazilian member of PT, the left-wing socialist workers' party, came up to me and said that at first he was skeptical of Obama, but realized the big change immediately when Obama's first action was to halt the trials in Guantanamo. We had fruitful discussion in which we agreed that the election did in fact constitute a social movement, and that even this moderate president could lead to a shift in the view of the United States from evil imperialist to the more acceptable greedy capitalist. We agreed that what we are seeing is baby steps. For instance, a trade agreement with stronger labor protections is baby steps toward a better world, and we were both hopeful that such a thing is possible now. I'm not known for my love of babies, but any one whose first steps could help to halt the slaughter of trade union activists across the global south requires me to hold him up and protect him.



3 comments:

Adriana Vega said...

Great point. Obama might be a moderate, but his election has set a radical precedent for the US and for the world.

Also, if Obama were not a moderate, he would not have been elected. I want to ask Marie what is the point of being "radical" if your discourse do not necessarily make a positive change for the people you are trying to work for?

For a foreigner, like me, it was radical to see the mobilization of Obama’s campaign. It was incredible to know so many people were volunteering and voting. Especially people voting for the first time; it was encouraging seeing lots of young people involved in politics and understanding their responsibility as citizens. Perhaps even more touching was to see people who earned the right to vote decades ago, but never voted before because they felt they would not be represented by any candidate. That is radical.

The only “radicals” we need are radical thinkers who can organize and mobilize people finding a way to push (even if moderate) political reform. It was deeply moving to see hope, happiness and even tears on people’s faces in DC during inauguration. The almost three years I have been in the US have been a democracy lesson. After the inauguration ceremony my Chinese friend and I asked each other: “Are we going to see anything like this in our countries?” None of us is certain, but we don’t think our countries are close.

Maybe Marie would understand if she would have been in the US in the last two years. Or better, if she would think for a second if she has seen a political movement, as radical as this one in France during her lifetime. I’m very happy I was here to see it. I'm happy for my fellow American friends in the whole continent.

Ps:
Great pictures!!! Brazilians are also celebration the 50 years of the Cuban revolution. Viva the women’s movement in Portuguese.

Anonymous said...

John Edwards as a radical? Ple-ease! Goes to show you how words, "just words", can obfuscate the real thing. John Edwards had good words - and no substance. Period.

Anonymous said...

All I have to say is that I am glad that they send smart people like you to these things. I would have immediately challenged Marie to a one armed drinking contest to settle the matter. Viva Tami!

and really, after Bush, Obama IS a radical in his moderation.